Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

media-video/obs-studio: +++ 25.0.7 --- 25.0.3 #15488

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

media-video/obs-studio: +++ 25.0.7 --- 25.0.3 #15488

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

Chiitoo
Copy link
Contributor

@Chiitoo Chiitoo commented Apr 23, 2020

No description provided.

@Chiitoo
media-video/obs-studio: add version 25.0.7
ffec8a7 
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/718958
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Jimi Huotari <chiitoo@gentoo.org>
@Chiitoo
media-video/obs-studio: remove version 25.0.3
acfc0ae 
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Jimi Huotari <chiitoo@gentoo.org>
@Chiitoo Chiitoo requested a review from a17r April 23, 2020 18:38
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @Chiitoo
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: media-video/obs-studio

media-video/obs-studio: @Chiitoo

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 718958

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else) assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Apr 23, 2020
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-04-24 00:25 UTC
Newest commit scanned: acfc0ae
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/91bf0cc/output.html

@a17r
Copy link
Member

a17r commented Apr 25, 2020

Maybe you can address this at the same time: https://bugs.gentoo.org/719440

a17r
a17r approved these changes May 2, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@a17r a17r left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess the bug can be dealt with any time later.

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot closed this in 58a9cc6 May 2, 2020
@Chiitoo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Chiitoo commented May 2, 2020

Sorry, meant to at least comment on it earlier, and then got busy with the LXQt bump and stuff...

I'm not immediately sure what to do about it, and didn't really know what to say. Well, still don't, but I'll try to get to doing something about it soon.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@a17r a17r a17r approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
4 participants
@Chiitoo @gentoo-bot @gentoo-repo-qa-bot @a17r