Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-qt/qtwebengine: add ~ppc64 keyword and patchset #15982

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

gyakovlev
Copy link
Member

Hi =)

It's me as promised.
Here's how I think it can be handled more or less safely. I'll maintain patchset, it's very unlikely to change. I used it for entire lifetime of qt-5.13 and 5.14 and not a single change was needed.

No extra keywords planned this time to give it some time to rest in the tree, and see how things go.
maybe just Falkon and unmask webengine useflag for kdecore-meta only, so people can get a working browser.

the only browser that works without patching on ppc64 currently is firefox, but it lacks JS Jit, so JS heavy sites can be laggy. Having falkon as an options is a nice bonus.

I also maintain chromium patchset for ppc64le, which is on version 83 so far, so I have some time discover issues with patches, since qtwebengine is always behind.

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.100, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev gyakovlev@gentoo.org

@gyakovlev gyakovlev requested review from a17r and Chiitoo May 27, 2020 01:56
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @gyakovlev
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-qt/qtwebengine

dev-qt/qtwebengine: @gentoo/qt

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels May 27, 2020
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-05-27 02:26 UTC
Newest commit scanned: f09f175
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/5caf2609fe/output.html

@a17r a17r requested a review from Pesa May 27, 2020 07:44
@gyakovlev
Copy link
Member Author

actually, patchset is a bit dirty, need to get rid of .orig files, so don't merge, let's just discuss =)

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-05-27 10:52 UTC
Newest commit scanned: e49d119
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/666758ad94/output.html

Copy link
Contributor

@Pesa Pesa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm ok with accepting this patchset in principle, given that you can be considered the "upstream" for ppc64 support in chromium. But see the ebuild comments.
Do you maintain a branch or fork where you develop/rebase these patches? Might be useful to mention it somewhere.

dev-qt/qtwebengine/qtwebengine-5.15.0.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dev-qt/qtwebengine/qtwebengine-5.15.0.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dev-qt/qtwebengine/qtwebengine-5.15.0.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
dev-qt/qtwebengine/qtwebengine-5.15.0.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gyakovlev
Copy link
Member Author

gyakovlev commented May 27, 2020

I'm ok with accepting this patchset in principle, given that you can be considered the "upstream" for ppc64 support in chromium. But see the ebuild comments.
Do you maintain a branch or fork where you develop/rebase these patches? Might be useful to mention it somewhere.

patches are from here

https://github.com/chromium-ppc64le/

and that's the upstream for ppc64 support, it's also used by ungoogled-chromium, electron port and others.
Everything is being slowly slowly upstreamed, a lot of work in progress behind the scenes.

I maintain local patches for myself and some users. No git right now, but there will be a repo soon, it's work in progress.

Since I could not get ppc64 patches and keywords get to gentoo (chromium moves way to fast, patches lag a bit), current gentoo chromium ebuild only supports ppc64 glue, it has some logic in it, but does not have keywords. Users run a script that downloads correct patches to build on gentoo and place them to /etc/portage/patches/.. to build it.

@gyakovlev gyakovlev force-pushed the qtwebengine-ppc64 branch 2 times, most recently from 6fa8463 to 023d2c2 Compare May 27, 2020 22:58
@@ -85,6 +88,9 @@ PATCHES=(
)

src_prepare() {
if use ppc64; then
eapply "${WORKDIR}/${PN}-ppc64"
fi
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(nit) add an empty line after this

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure, force-pushed.

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.100, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.100, Repoman-2.3.22
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-05-27 23:12 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 6fa8463
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/e9552574a2/output.html

a17r pushed a commit to a17r/qt that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
Sync metadata with Gentoo ebuild repo.

Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.6, Repoman-3.0.1
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
Closes: gentoo/gentoo#15982
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
gentoo-bot pushed a commit to gentoo/qt that referenced this pull request Sep 10, 2020
Sync metadata with Gentoo ebuild repo.

Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.6, Repoman-3.0.1
Closes: gentoo/gentoo#15982
Signed-off-by: Georgy Yakovlev <gyakovlev@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits.
Projects
None yet
5 participants