Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sys-block/zram-init: version bump #16049

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

sys-block/zram-init: version bump #16049

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

beatussum
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Jun 2, 2020
@beatussum beatussum force-pushed the zram-init branch 2 times, most recently from 58f3be2 to fa4e4aa Compare June 2, 2020 09:48
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-06-02 09:57 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 2e9e6bc
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/731ce81724/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-06-02 10:56 UTC
Newest commit scanned: fa4e4aa
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/bdfa799f42/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-06-03 20:02 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 63b2384
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/6c2d46bace/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-06-04 07:52 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 3137854
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/e5b8e60008/output.html

@beatussum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@perfinion ping

@mjeveritt
Copy link
Contributor

This can be bumped again up to 10.3.

Ebuild looks good to me - you may want to open a bug if Jason isn't following here. I've pinged him on IRC and will be following this up for my own use 😃 !

@beatussum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mjeveritt As requested, I've bumped it up to 10.3, and I'm going to open a bug. Thanks for your reply! 👍

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-07-11 11:34 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 9687cee
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/0bd9798e2c/output.html

@beatussum beatussum changed the title sys-block/zram-init: version bump sys-block/zram-init: version bump [please reassign] Jul 11, 2020
@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot changed the title sys-block/zram-init: version bump [please reassign] sys-block/zram-init: version bump Jul 11, 2020
@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. and removed assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Jul 11, 2020
@beatussum beatussum changed the title sys-block/zram-init: version bump sys-block/zram-init: version bump [please reassign] Jul 11, 2020
@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot changed the title sys-block/zram-init: version bump [please reassign] sys-block/zram-init: version bump Jul 11, 2020
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @beatussum
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: sys-block/zram-init

sys-block/zram-init: @perfinion

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 732176

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. and removed assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Jul 11, 2020
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-07-11 12:19 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 3a93606
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/4dd80c7414/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-07-11 13:18 UTC
Newest commit scanned: c899086
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/89d77b4e3c/output.html

@beatussum
sys-block/zram-init: version bump
e29c0f3 
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/732176
Signed-off-by: Mattéo Rossillol‑‑Laruelle <beatussum@protonmail.com>
Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.99, Repoman-2.3.23
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-08-03 10:24 UTC
Newest commit scanned: e29c0f3
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/5120c7a5f0/output.html

beatussum
beatussum commented Aug 4, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor Author

@beatussum beatussum left a comment •
edited

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've some questions about the use of hprefixify.

sys-block/zram-init/zram-init-10.5.ebuild
src_prepare() {
default

hprefixify "${S}/man/${PN}.8"
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure about that: these lines are just documentation fields hprefixifyed.

sys-block/zram-init/zram-init-10.5.ebuild
Comment on lines +54 to +56
hprefixify -e "s%( |=)(/tmp)%\1${EPREFIX}\2%g" \
"${S}/systemd/system"/* \
"${S}/openrc"/*/*
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same thing.

@beatussum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@perfinion ping

@beatussum beatussum deleted the zram-init branch October 26, 2020 17:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
4 participants
@beatussum @gentoo-repo-qa-bot @mjeveritt @gentoo-bot