-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
net-vpn/i2pd-2.33.0: version bump #17314
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @khumarahn net-vpn/i2pd: @khumarahn, @gentoo/proxy-maint, @klondi Linked bugsNo bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Signed-off-by: Alexey Korepanov <kaikaikai@yandex.ru>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Korepanov <kaikaikai@yandex.ru>
removed websockets use flag from metadata, force pushed |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-08-29 13:55 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
dev-libs/libressl:0= | ||
>=dev-libs/boost-1.65:= | ||
) | ||
libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl:0= ) | ||
upnp? ( net-libs/miniupnpc ) | ||
)" | ||
DEPEND="${RDEPEND} | ||
static? ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does anyone actually want static for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's hard to tell. My feeling is that most people who use i2p don't want to be using it publicly. Maybe it can be useful for embedded devices?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was kind of my thinking too. Although they could build it themselves. We'll keep it in for now.
net-vpn/i2pd/i2pd-2.33.0.ebuild
Outdated
dev-libs/libressl:0= | ||
>=dev-libs/boost-1.65:= | ||
) | ||
libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl:0= ) | ||
upnp? ( net-libs/miniupnpc ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
:= for libraries we link against which have a subslot
upnp? ( net-libs/miniupnpc ) | ||
)" | ||
DEPEND="${RDEPEND} | ||
static? ( | ||
dev-libs/boost:=[static-libs,threads] | ||
sys-libs/zlib[static-libs] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
:= for libraries we link against which have a subslot
net-vpn/i2pd/i2pd-2.33.0.ebuild
Outdated
>=dev-libs/boost-1.65:= | ||
) | ||
sys-libs/zlib:=[static-libs] | ||
libressl? ( dev-libs/libressl:0=[static-libs] ) | ||
upnp? ( net-libs/miniupnpc[static-libs] ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
:= for libraries we link against which have a subslot
Signed-off-by: Alexey Korepanov <kaikaikai@yandex.ru>
@thesamesam thanks! I added |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-08-31 06:15 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Zlib is an annoying case because of that -- no problem, thanks! |
Very nice, thanks! |
Thank you for the contribution(s)! |
... with no changes to i2pd-2.32.1
@juippis hi again! you have been good in merging my previous PRs.