Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

profiles/package.mask: mask sci-libs/{blas,cblas,lapack} #18049

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

profiles/package.mask: mask sci-libs/{blas,cblas,lapack} #18049

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

epsilon-0
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Aisha Tammy gentoo@aisha.cc

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @epsilon-0
Areas affected: profiles
Packages affected: (none)

@gentoo/github

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

New packages

This Pull Request appears to be introducing new packages only. Due to limited manpower, adding new packages is considered low priority. This does not mean that your Pull Request will not receive any attention, however, it might take quite some time for it to be reviewed. In the meantime, your new ebuild might find a home in the GURU project repository: the ebuild repository maintained collaboratively by Gentoo users. GURU offers your ebuild a place to be reviewed and improved by other Gentoo users, while making it easy for Gentoo users to install it and enjoy the software it adds.

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added the need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually. label Oct 27, 2020
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-10-27 20:01 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 7ce4bd0
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/de1478c75d/output.html

@rossbridger
Copy link
Contributor

Doesn't this collide with #17836?

@epsilon-0
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rossbridger
yea this is being done earlier so that people can have time to prepare.
then we will do the removal later.

@epsilon-0
Copy link
Contributor Author

@SoapGentoo here it is

@SoapGentoo
Copy link
Member

@epsilon-0 could you rebase this commit pls?

@epsilon-0
virtual/{blas,lapack}: drop old packages
96e9dbd 
reference implementations are masked

Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.8, Repoman-3.0.1
Signed-off-by: Aisha Tammy <gentoo@aisha.cc>
@epsilon-0
profiles/package.mask: mask sci-libs/{blas,cblas,lapack}
18875d7 
Signed-off-by: Aisha Tammy <gentoo@aisha.cc>
@epsilon-0 epsilon-0 deleted the lapackMASK branch October 31, 2020 22:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@SoapGentoo SoapGentoo SoapGentoo approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
6 participants
@epsilon-0 @gentoo-bot @gentoo-repo-qa-bot @rossbridger @SoapGentoo @robbat2