-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
*/*: fix building with gcc-10 #18462
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @jsmolic @gentoo/github: Too many disjoint maintainers, disabling auto-assignment. Linked bugsBugs linked: 717250, 707686, 709300, 707480, 707606, 707032, 707002, 707262 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
0167d72
to
33cfb28
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-11-30 20:04 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-11-30 20:34 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-11-30 21:54 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
2e6db8c
to
16ea96e
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-11-30 22:14 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-11-30 22:34 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-12-06 13:50 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-12-12 17:20 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
* Thanks to Jeroen Roovers for submitting the fno-common patch Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/717250 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/709300 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707002 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707686 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
* Thanks to Sam James for providing the patch link Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707032 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707606 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707480 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
* Port to cmake eclass * Minor additional cleanup * Thanks to Jeroen Roovers for submitting the patch link and to Eddie Chapman for providing the patch fix Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/707262 Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.9, Repoman-3.0.1 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolic <jakov.smolic@sartura.hr>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2020-12-27 12:19 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Excellent work! Make sure you keep bug links in patches ideally (or add them in if they don't exist). I follow this guide roughly (but you were right to strip out that git nonsense from the awesomewm patch I added in a hurry ;)). |
@thesamesam Thanks :) |
No description provided.