Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

sci-libs/kissfft: new package #18767

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

sci-libs/kissfft: new package #18767

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

stkw0
Copy link
Contributor

@stkw0 stkw0 commented Dec 22, 2020

Moved from guru because sci-libs/vtk needs it (https://github.com/gentoo/guru/issues/23)

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/754684
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.12, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: David Roman davidroman96@gmail.com

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @stkw0
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: sci-libs/kissfft

sci-libs/kissfft: @gentoo/proxy-maint (new package)

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 754684

New packages

This Pull Request appears to be introducing new packages only. Due to limited manpower, adding new packages is considered low priority. This does not mean that your Pull Request will not receive any attention, however, it might take quite some time for it to be reviewed. In the meantime, your new ebuild might find a home in the GURU project repository: the ebuild repository maintained collaboratively by Gentoo users. GURU offers your ebuild a place to be reviewed and improved by other Gentoo users, while making it easy for Gentoo users to install it and enjoy the software it adds.

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added new package The PR is adding a new package. self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else) assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Dec 22, 2020
@stkw0 stkw0 force-pushed the kissfft branch 2 times, most recently from 96f3759 to ed2ba8c Compare December 23, 2020 04:10
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-12-23 04:29 UTC
Newest commit scanned: ed2ba8c
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/83f15f82af/output.html

@Alessandro-Barbieri
Copy link
Contributor

You are closing the wrong bug. You should close https://bugs.gentoo.org/754690 instead

@stkw0
Copy link
Contributor Author

stkw0 commented Dec 23, 2020

You are closing the wrong bug. You should close https://bugs.gentoo.org/754690 instead

I didn't intended to close the bug but just reference it. "Bug:" tag is the same that "Close"?
I didn't saw that other bug, will add it now

@Alessandro-Barbieri
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, my bad

@Alessandro-Barbieri
Copy link
Contributor

@epsilon-0 here it is

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2020-12-23 05:04 UTC
Newest commit scanned: f204658
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/e9eb4a9384/output.html

@epsilon-0 epsilon-0 mentioned this pull request Dec 24, 2020
Closed
epsilon-0
epsilon-0 suggested changes Jan 25, 2021
View reviewed changes
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SoapGentoo
SoapGentoo suggested changes Jan 25, 2021
View reviewed changes
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
sci-libs/kissfft/kissfft-131.ebuild Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-02-25 22:22 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 7ecf76e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/9a34e7a40b/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-02 00:12 UTC
Newest commit scanned: ecf3ea6
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/93ec8d4e36/output.html

@epsilon-0
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, it looks a lot better.
Just drop the 131 ebuild, thanks!

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-02 00:47 UTC
Newest commit scanned: d0905f2
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/821290fa7e/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-02 10:22 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 339ac7a
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/be04f7918c/output.html

@stkw0
sci-libs/kissfft: new package
2e75765 
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/754690
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/754684
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.12, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: David Roman <davidroman96@gmail.com>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-07 00:22 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 2e75765
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c5ba77e95c/output.html

@epsilon-0
Copy link
Contributor

I've made a new PR with a few more options and optional testing - #20513
If you want you can take the ebuilds from there, I don't mind.

@stkw0
Copy link
Contributor Author

stkw0 commented Apr 23, 2021

@epsilon-0 Thank you :) I will close this PR then to avoid having duplicates

@stkw0 stkw0 closed this Apr 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@Alessandro-Barbieri Alessandro-Barbieri Alessandro-Barbieri left review comments

@epsilon-0 epsilon-0 epsilon-0 requested changes

@SoapGentoo SoapGentoo SoapGentoo requested changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. new package The PR is adding a new package. self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
6 participants
@stkw0 @gentoo-bot @gentoo-repo-qa-bot @Alessandro-Barbieri @epsilon-0 @SoapGentoo