Bump app-emulation/fuse and app-emulation/libspectrum

[ghost]

Please merge. Thanks.

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @atomsymbol
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: app-emulation/fuse, app-emulation/libspectrum

app-emulation/fuse: @atomsymbol, @gentoo/proxy-maint
app-emulation/libspectrum: @atomsymbol, @gentoo/proxy-maint

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-01 19:35 UTC
Newest commit scanned: e5ec5f1
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/dcb5454039/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-05 02:30 UTC
Newest commit scanned: d00bb7e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7de1d4f023/output.html

[thesamesam]

You seem to have closed the PR. If that was intentional, I'm sorry you've decided to not contribute. Was it in response to the review?

if you're closing it just to work on the comments, you can mark it as a draft.

This seems strange to me given you commented on saving people's time, yet you closed it after feedback was given. Can we do something to help?

[ghost]

You seem to have closed the PR. If that was intentional, I'm sorry you've decided to not contribute. Was it in response to the review?

if you're closing it just to work on the comments, you can mark it as a draft.

This seems strange to me given you commented on saving people's time, yet you closed it after feedback was given. Can we do something to help?

I believe that Gentoo package specifications are too informal and this generates a lot (in my opinion at least) of unnecessary noise that would be avoidable. I believe there is nothing anybody can about this in the short term to improve the situation. In long term, anything is possible of course.

[juippis]

Yep we are aware of this problem, especially with people who contribute rarely and don't keep up with the standards or development pace. That's why currently we rather encourage these people to not become maintainers, but just submit their contributions when they can if they want. And we're now only accepting people who are more active to become actual maintainers.

That being said, you're always welcome to contribute to any maintainer-needed package without having to become the maintainer. Then we'll collaborate on making it be acceptable by today's specifics, and merge. Thanks for everything you've done, I know you had a good run with us.