Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-java/core-specs-alpha: bumping to new version #20016

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

dev-java/core-specs-alpha: bumping to new version #20016

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Mar 20, 2021

Bumping to core-specs-alpha-0.2.56

Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.17, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi marco@scardovi.com

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @scardracs
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-java/core-specs-alpha

dev-java/core-specs-alpha: @tgbugs, @gentoo/proxy-maint

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Mar 20, 2021
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-20 06:43 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 7c00694
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/f1319d9015/output.html

@tgbugs
Copy link
Contributor

tgbugs commented Mar 20, 2021

Everything seems ok to me.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-20 10:48 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 368d49e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7ec5d54551/output.html

@tgbugs
Copy link
Contributor

tgbugs commented Mar 20, 2021

I think you still want SLOT="0.2", otherwise there will be a fight between 0.2.44 and 0.2.56 which should not be installed at the same time on the same system. The slotting for 0.1 vs 0.2 has to do with the different requirements for clojure 1.9 vs 1.10.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Mar 20, 2021

I think you still want SLOT="0.2", otherwise there will be a fight between 0.2.44 and 0.2.56 which should not be installed at the same time on the same system. The slotting for 0.1 vs 0.2 has to do with the different requirements for clojure 1.9 vs 1.10.

Thanks for the tip, I will fix it asap

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-20 22:34 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 3ca95d0
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/8fb4f366ac/output.html

@juippis
Copy link
Member

juippis commented Mar 23, 2021

@tgbugs can you test this, what do you think?

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-23 08:49 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 4ad80bd
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1272f73c53/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-23 10:09 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 5a57664
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/01d762175a/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-23 10:18 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 2bf7d60
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/453ca0fa35/output.html

@ghost ghost requested a review from juippis March 29, 2021 14:19
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.17, Repoman-3.0.2
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <marco@scardovi.com>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-03-29 15:24 UTC
Newest commit scanned: cb70a5c
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c4c0f4b9c8/output.html


EGIT_REF="053d789"

MY_PN=core.specs.alpha
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You can use ver_rs here too, something to consider for the next version bump.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, there's a ver_rs function that you can use to manipulate the version separators. So you can simply use it to replace - with . in ${PN}.

@ghost ghost deleted the core-specs-alpha branch April 4, 2021 06:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits.
Projects
None yet
4 participants