net-misc/rsync: Passing --disable-asm to myeconfargs array [ADVA]

[wikjas]

The optimization works properly only for x86_64 arch, so there is no need to use asm for other archs.
Comparing the output of present compiler, use of asm has no impact on performance.

Here are the results of cross-compilation with unchagned ebuild (amd64 - native):
powerpc64 x86_64-vm armv7 aarch64 i686
fail ok fail fail fail

native
ok

From the logs of failed compilation:

./lib/md5-asm-x86_64.S:698: Error: unrecognized opcode: pop' ./lib/md5-asm-x86_64.S:699: Error: unrecognized opcode: ret'
./lib/md5-asm-x86_64.S:65: Error: unsupported relocation against %rdi
./lib/md5-asm-x86_64.S:683: Error: unsupported relocation against $64
./lib/md5-asm-x86_64.S:684: Error: unsupported relocation against %rdi
If you can't fix the issue, re-run ./configure with --disable-asm.

And here the results with changed ebuild (amd64 - native):
powerpc64 x86_64-vm armv7 aarch64 i686
ok ok ok ok ok

native
ok

As it was suggested in the discussion: #22354 (comment) #22354 (comment) of my previous pull request i added --disable-asm in the myeconfargs array,
i also applied it conditionally for the x86_64.

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @wikjas
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: net-misc/rsync

net-misc/rsync: @gentoo/base-system

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.

Missing GCO sign-off

Please read the terms of Gentoo Certificate of Origin and acknowledge them by adding a sign-off to all your commits.

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[thesamesam]

You're welcome to just force push in the branch for the other PR (#22354). Are you sure you've addressed our comments over there...?

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2021-10-22 08:55 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 0ed6e31
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/48339f170e/output.html

[wikjas]

You're welcome to just force push in the branch for the other PR (#22354). Are you sure you've addressed our comments over there...?

I edited the description with the links to your comments.