Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x11-terms/{st,st-terminfo}: add proxied maintainer #23704

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

ferki
Copy link
Contributor

@ferki ferki commented Jan 8, 2022

This PR is an attempt to add myself as proxied maintainer of x11-terms/st and x11-terms/st-terminfo (as briefly discussed with @gyakovlev via IRC). There's also a minor indent fix on a separate commit - take it or leave it :)

Please review and merge, or let me know how to improve it further.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @ferki
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: x11-terms/st, x11-terms/st-terminfo

x11-terms/st: @gyakovlev
x11-terms/st-terminfo: @gyakovlev

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Jan 8, 2022
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-01-08 18:35 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 0d5f74a
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7cb8eaee70/output.html

@gyakovlev
Copy link
Member

looks good, but let's not add proxy-maint team.
let's just leave 2 of us.
non gentoo.org maintainer can be there without proxy team with another developer without team if agreed upon.
and I'm part of proxy-maint team, so that's fine with me too.

also feel free to move yourself on top/as first, but that'll make you primary assignee for bugs (not that we get many)
it's ok if you don't do that.

Signed-off-by: Ferenc Erki <erkiferenc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Erki <erkiferenc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ferenc Erki <erkiferenc@gmail.com>
@ferki
Copy link
Contributor Author

ferki commented Jan 9, 2022

@gyakovlev: thanks for the feedback! I have rebased this PR on top of current default branch, removed the proxy-maint team, and moved my entry to the top.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-01-09 20:50 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 1796924
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/f73841a8f8/output.html

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot closed this in 3814b8c Jan 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits.
Projects
None yet
4 participants