Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-java/glassfish-xmlrpc-api: Fix build error on Java 11+; EAPI 8 #23859

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Leo3418
Copy link
Contributor

@Leo3418 Leo3418 commented Jan 18, 2022

Successor of #23822. dev-java/glassfish-xmlrpc-api requires Java package javax.xml.soap, which is no longer in the JDK proper as of Java 11. This PR declares the provider of javax.xml.soap as a dependency so it can be built on JDK 11.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @Leo3418
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-java/glassfish-xmlrpc-api

dev-java/glassfish-xmlrpc-api: @gentoo/java

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 831295


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Jan 18, 2022
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-01-18 18:16 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 27f62f5
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/e4e5248b0b/output.html

@fordfrog
Copy link
Contributor

@Leo3418 merged, thanks! just please note that we cannot close the referenced bug until the failing ebuild is gone so i changed that in the commit message. for your new version of the ebuild, we should wait for at least two days and then we can file stabilization request i guess.

@Leo3418
Copy link
Contributor Author

Leo3418 commented Jan 19, 2022

@Leo3418 merged, thanks! just please note that we cannot close the referenced bug until the failing ebuild is gone so i changed that in the commit message. for your new version of the ebuild, we should wait for at least two days and then we can file stabilization request i guess.

Sure, thanks for the correction and patience! I've still got things to learn...

@Leo3418 Leo3418 deleted the bug-831295 branch January 20, 2022 22:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR.
Projects
None yet
4 participants