Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

vim-{doc,plugin}.eclass: support EAPI 8 #24928

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

laumann
Copy link
Contributor

@laumann laumann commented Apr 6, 2022

vim-doc.eclass

  • Replace instances of $var with ${var}

vim-plugin.eclass

  • Drop EAPI 0, 1, 2 workarounds
  • Move EXPORT_FUNCTIONS to end of file
  • Add required @USAGE: on functions

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/830867
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/830866

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @laumann
Areas affected: eclasses
Packages affected: (none)

@gentoo/github

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 830866, 830867

New packages

This Pull Request appears to be introducing new packages only. Due to limited manpower, adding new packages is considered low priority. This does not mean that your Pull Request will not receive any attention, however, it might take quite some time for it to be reviewed. In the meantime, your new ebuild might find a home in the GURU project repository: the ebuild repository maintained collaboratively by Gentoo users. GURU offers your ebuild a place to be reviewed and improved by other Gentoo users, while making it easy for Gentoo users to install it and enjoy the software it adds.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually. bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Apr 6, 2022
@laumann
Copy link
Contributor Author

laumann commented Apr 6, 2022

cc @monsieurp

Should there be an inherit guard in vim-plugin.eclass, like vim-doc.eclass?

@laumann
Copy link
Contributor Author

laumann commented Apr 6, 2022

Also, I know I'm supposed to send patches to gentoo-dev ML - was thinking I'd do that after adding changes here.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-04-06 07:47 UTC
Newest commit scanned: cf76eeb
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/ea9cc64736/output.html

@laumann laumann force-pushed the eapi8/vim-plugin.eclass branch 2 times, most recently from b1b7726 to 0e07753 Compare April 6, 2022 08:05
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-04-06 08:12 UTC
Newest commit scanned: b1b7726
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/84051a580d/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-04-06 08:42 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 0e07753
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/a197f6bfc3/output.html

Copy link
Member

@monsieurp monsieurp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! Merging underway.

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot closed this in 94eb6d9 Apr 6, 2022
@monsieurp monsieurp reopened this Apr 6, 2022
@monsieurp
Copy link
Member

Let's wait until those patches are reviewed on the gentoo-dev ML.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@laumann.xyz>
 * Drop EAPI 0, 1, 2 workarounds
 * Move EXPORT_FUNCTIONS to end of file
 * Add required @Usage on functions

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/830867
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/830866
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bracht Laumann Jespersen <t@laumann.xyz>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-04-06 12:02 UTC
Newest commit scanned: bdfefd1
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/28ec7aeda2/output.html

@thesamesam
Copy link
Member

thesamesam commented Apr 7, 2022

I made some comments a while ago that @monsieurp was going to circle back to. Could you ensure they're addressed in this set? https://marc.info/?l=gentoo-dev&m=162692547126278&w=2

(At a skim, I think they are.)

@laumann
Copy link
Contributor Author

laumann commented Apr 7, 2022

Closing this in favor of #24941.

@laumann laumann closed this Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. need assignment It was impossible to assign the PR correctly. Please assign it manually.
Projects
None yet
5 participants