sys-fs/dd-rescue: Fix building for musl.

[listout]

The original patch was written by gentoo developer Thomas Deutschmann
whissi@gentoo.org, but the patch needed to be rebased. I've added in
my secmem patch inside it (another musl fix for dd-rescue).

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/829285

Signed-off-by: brahmajit das listout@protonmail.com

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @listout
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: sys-fs/dd-rescue

sys-fs/dd-rescue: @gentoo/base-system

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 829285

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-07-17 20:29 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 58388b5
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/cf24fca4fd/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-07-18 04:59 UTC
Newest commit scanned: b54d5d5
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62f0ee0349/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-09-13 19:43 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 65e57c6
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/6eb34d8c07/output.html

[thesamesam]

Doesn't apply.

>>> Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/work
>>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/work/dd_rescue-1.99.12 ...
 * Applying dd-rescue-1.99.11-musl-r2.patch ...
patching file configure.ac
Hunk #1 FAILED at 11.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file configure.ac.rej
patching file ddr_ctrl.h
patching file ffs.h
patching file fiemap.h
patching file fmt_no.h
patching file fstrim.h
patching file libddr_hash.c
patching file libddr_lzo.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 26 with fuzz 2.
patching file libddr_null.c
patching file sha512.h
patching file secmem.c                                                                                                                                                                                   [ !! ]
 * ERROR: sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12::gentoo failed (prepare phase):
 *   patch -p1  failed with /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/files/dd-rescue-1.99.11-musl-r2.patch
 *
 * Call stack:
 *               ebuild.sh, line  122:  Called src_prepare
 *             environment, line 2413:  Called default
 *      phase-functions.sh, line  872:  Called default_src_prepare
 *      phase-functions.sh, line  937:  Called __eapi6_src_prepare
 *             environment, line  263:  Called eapply '/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/files/dd-rescue-1.99.11-musl-r2.patch'
 *             environment, line 1154:  Called _eapply_patch '/var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/files/dd-rescue-1.99.11-musl-r2.patch'
 *             environment, line 1092:  Called __helpers_die 'patch -p1  failed with /var/tmp/portage/sys-fs/dd-rescue-1.99.12/files/dd-rescue-1.99.11-musl-r2.patch'
 *   isolated-functions.sh, line  112:  Called die
 * The specific snippet of code:
 *              die "$@"
 *

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-09-15 07:03 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 93889e3
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/63a8ec71bc/output.html

[listout]

@thesamesam Thanks for that, I've fixed it. But the patch for x.11 and x.12 is not the same and I cannot rename the patch file without losing history. Any advice?

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-09-15 07:23 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 830488c
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/c75d46af27/output.html

[thesamesam]

@thesamesam Thanks for that, I've fixed it. But the patch for x.11 and x.12 is not the same and I cannot rename the patch file without losing history. Any advice?

Just fix x.12 (copy to a new file and note in the commit message you based it on foo.patch).

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-06-29 18:55 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 475fdcc
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1b474436a6/output.html