New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev-python/watchfiles: Keyword 0.16.1 sparc, #852878 #26739
Conversation
Signed-off-by: matoro <matoro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: matoro <matoro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: matoro <matoro@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @matoro app-text/mdbook: @ionenwks Linked bugsNo bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment. If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ LICENSE=" | |||
BSD CC0-1.0 ISC MIT MPL-2.0 openssl unicode | |||
doc? ( CC-BY-4.0 OFL-1.1 )" | |||
SLOT="0" | |||
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~riscv ~x86" | |||
KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~riscv ~sparc ~x86" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this really work? Sparc fixes are in maturin-0.13.2_beta1 (okay to keyword that one instead)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, it seems it did install beta1, but nattka apply
chose to add the kw to this version instead. How should I have invoked it instead? I used nattka apply -a sparc 852878
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(theory fixes anyway, upstream didn't get to test it afaik)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah okay, I believe it just doesn't try to keyword unkeyworded ebuilds given these are often live ebuilds. Probably should just do it manually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It passes tests on real hardware. Used rust-bin-1.62.1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, I'll drop a quick note upstream that it's fine.
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-08-04 19:16 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Signed-off-by: matoro <matoro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: matoro <matoro@users.noreply.github.com>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-08-04 19:51 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
No description provided.