Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong target install-doc and source-highlight dependency #26913

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

listout
Copy link
Contributor

@listout listout commented Aug 18, 2022

The make target install-doc is wrong and install_doc should be used
in this package's case.

gnu source-highlight is needed for source highlighting by asciidoc

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865465
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865469

Signed-off-by: brahmajit das listout@protonmail.com

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Aug 18, 2022
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-08-18 17:21 UTC
Newest commit scanned: b2e7d12
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/3427f2e59a/output.html

…t dependency

The make target install-doc is wrong and install_doc should be used
in this package's case.

gnu source-highlight is needed for source highlighting by asciidoc

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865465
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/865469

Signed-off-by: brahmajit das <listout@protonmail.com>
@listout listout changed the title dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong make target install-doc [please reassign] dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong make target install-doc Aug 18, 2022
@listout listout changed the title [please reassign] dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong make target install-doc [please reassign] dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong target install-doc and source-highlight dependency Aug 18, 2022
@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot changed the title [please reassign] dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong target install-doc and source-highlight dependency dev-libs/libtracefs: Fix wrong target install-doc and source-highlight dependency Aug 18, 2022
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @listout
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-libs/libtracefs

dev-libs/libtracefs: @chutz

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 865465, 865469


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. and removed assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Aug 18, 2022
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-08-18 18:46 UTC
Newest commit scanned: d365b92
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/0d2ceef6b1/output.html

BDEPEND="
virtual/pkgconfig
doc? ( app-text/xmlto app-text/asciidoc )
doc? ( app-text/xmlto app-text/asciidoc dev-util/source-highlight )
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please split this in to multiple lines, like this

    doc? (
        app-text/xmlto
        app-text/asciidoc
        dev-util/source-highlight
    )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR.
Projects
None yet
4 participants