Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

app-crypt/keybase: bump to 6.0.2, update ebuilds, new maintainer #27373

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ran-dall
Copy link
Contributor

Go mod Deps: https://file.io/igx532a7YPkB

Special Thanks to @simonvanderveldt for starting the work in this PR.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @ran-dall
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: app-crypt/keybase

app-crypt/keybase: @nicolasbock

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Sep 21, 2022
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-09-21 02:02 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 4855ddf
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/e6351e3897/output.html

Copy link
Member

@nicolasbock nicolasbock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ran-dall ! Thanks for submitting this ebuild!

Could you verify the SRC_URI? I can't seem to download the source code.

@ran-dall
Copy link
Contributor Author

#27372 (comment)

@ran-dall
Copy link
Contributor Author

@nicolasbock Also, I apologize for taking you off as a maintainer. I assumed you were no longer around. If you want me to add you back, I can.

@nicolasbock
Copy link
Member

No worries. I am still here although I am usually pretty busy and don't have as much time for Gentoo as I would like. You can add me back.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-09-29 00:03 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 1fd607b
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/450b2020b7/output.html

@ran-dall
Copy link
Contributor Author

ran-dall commented Nov 3, 2022

@nicolasbock Sorry, mate, I got really busy there for a minute. So I've re-up'd the dep files to files.io: https://file.io/OytRndYmCril

You'd find both the deps for kbfs and keybase at that same link. From here, you can upload them to your Gentoo space and send me a link; I can then update both ebuilds.

To try this out locally, you should be able to drop both .tar.xz files into your /var/cache/distfiles directory and proceed.

Signed-off-by: Randall T. Vasquez <ran.dall@icloud.com>
Signed-off-by: Randall T. Vasquez <ran.dall@icloud.com>
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-11-03 02:33 UTC
Newest commit scanned: b88d1e1
Status: ❌ broken

New issues caused by PR:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/d1cf3afdd2/output.html#app-crypt/keybase

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/d1cf3afdd2/output.html

@simonvanderveldt
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasbock Is there anything preventing this and #27372 from being merged?
Also pinging @thesamesam as well as @ajakk because they (were) mentioned in the removal PR (#26954 (comment)) when wanting to restore these packages.

@nicolasbock
Copy link
Member

@simonvanderveldt No I don't see any major blockers. I just have to upload that file @ran-dall created. I'll hopefully be able to get to it by tomorrow.

@nicolasbock
Copy link
Member

Thanks @ran-dall for working on this!

@simonvanderveldt
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasbock Thanks for getting this through/in the tree again! 👍

@nicolasbock
Copy link
Member

Sorry this took so long, but no worries, any time.

@ran-dall ran-dall deleted the add/keybase branch March 16, 2023 00:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits.
Projects
None yet
5 participants