Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

*: install gsed, gfind, gxargs, gpatch for better BSD compatibility #28044

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

mgorny
Copy link
Member

@mgorny mgorny commented Oct 30, 2022

As a continuation of the previous effort, after covering gcpio and gtar, let's add other tools that the BSD profiles mentioned: gsed, gfind, gxargs, gpatch. As previously, the GNU versions are installed as g* and symlinked to their base name to make it easy to relink them to alternative implementations.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @mgorny
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: sys-apps/findutils, sys-apps/sed, sys-devel/patch

sys-apps/findutils: @gentoo/base-system
sys-apps/sed: @gentoo/base-system
sys-devel/patch: @gentoo/base-system

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits. labels Oct 30, 2022
@SoapGentoo
Copy link
Member

also, EAPI 8 the lot? We can use EAPI 8 in base now.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-10-30 14:08 UTC
Newest commit scanned: da4ea3e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/65159dc589/output.html

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
@mgorny
Copy link
Member Author

mgorny commented Oct 30, 2022

Done and done.

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
@mgorny
Copy link
Member Author

mgorny commented Oct 30, 2022

Included switching cpio and tar to --program-prefix. For the latter, it's basically "choose your poison". Either we mv tar and rmt, or we mv back the other weird tools. I'm wondering if anyone really pays attention to that stuff, though. USE=-minimal was weird, to say lightly. backup is renamed to backup-tar but backup.sh is not.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-10-30 14:28 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 67ca032
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/af5ad9f4f9/output.html

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2022-10-30 14:38 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 67f2e15
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1be656c9a8/output.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). no bug found No Bug/Closes found in the commits.
Projects
None yet
5 participants