New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
profiles: mask net-print/{apsfilter,kyocera-mita-ppds} for future last-rite #28606
Conversation
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-08 22:23 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-10 21:33 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-11 13:08 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
@thesamesam could you please merge it? I'm gonna post it over gentoo-dev ml, if required |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-11 22:28 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @scardracs @gentoo/github Linked bugsBugs linked: 884881, 884307, 885605, 741102 New packagesThis Pull Request appears to be introducing new packages only. Due to limited manpower, adding new packages is considered low priority. This does not mean that your Pull Request will not receive any attention, however, it might take quite some time for it to be reviewed. In the meantime, your new ebuild might find a home in the GURU project repository: the ebuild repository maintained collaboratively by Gentoo users. GURU offers your ebuild a place to be reviewed and improved by other Gentoo users, while making it easy for Gentoo users to install it and enjoy the software it adds. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-12 14:48 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-13 22:28 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/884881 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/884307 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741102 Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi <mscardovi@icloud.com>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2022-12-14 20:33 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can't "close" the bugs with a package.mask, if this mask was reverted the bugs would be closed even though they are valid. I'll switch to use a Bug:
reference instead.
(For a public note:) Please send out the last-rites only after the mask has been applied.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/885605
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/884881
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/884307
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/741102
Signed-off-by: Marco Scardovi mscardovi@icloud.com