net-misc/tigervnc: add 1.12.90 #29105
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @ceamac net-misc/tigervnc: @ceamac Linked bugsBugs linked: 864809 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
gentoo-bot
added
self-maintained
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-01-14 19:18 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
This is called "1.13.0 Beta" in their release page, so try to get ready for "1.13.0": https://github.com/TigerVNC/tigervnc/releases/tag/v1.12.90 Also add viewer USE flag to complement turbovnc. I tested and I can install and run both combinations of {tiger,turbo}vnc {server,viewer} Sync live (live is 1.13.80 now) Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/864809 Signed-off-by: Viorel Munteanu <ceamac@gentoo.org>
`viewer` makes more sense than `client`. It also matches the USE flag in tigervnc. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/864809 Signed-off-by: Viorel Munteanu <ceamac@gentoo.org>
ceamac
force-pushed
the
net-misc/tigervnc/v1.12.90
branch
from
4b3260b
to
cb4c887
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-01-15 08:18 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
This release with tag v1.12.90 is called 1.13.0 Beta on their release page, so try to get ready for 1.13.0
Also sync live (live is 1.13.80 now; I don't really understand their numbering scheme)
Also add
viewerUSE flag to complementturbovncand renameclient->viewerinturbovncbecause it makes more sense thanclientand because it's nice to have the same USE flag name for both. I hope this won't generate too much hate.I tried both combinations, it works on my machine :)