www-client/chromium: add ppc64 patchset for 109

[darkbasic]

Signed-off-by: Niccolò Belli niccolo.belli@linuxsystems.it

chromium-109.0.5414.74-r1 tested: builds and works fine.

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @darkbasic
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: www-client/chromium

www-client/chromium: @gentoo/chromium

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-01-14 20:38 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 627580b
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/3944196347/output.html

[stha09]

Can you add https://gist.github.com/stha09/3955be8eb8aa6f960972c5136c7dd466 for bundled libpng (I'm compiling with USE=-system-png at the moment)? We may want to mask system-av1, because system dav1d is still broken with USE=asm.

[darkbasic]

Can you add https://gist.github.com/stha09/3955be8eb8aa6f960972c5136c7dd466 for bundled libpng (I'm compiling with USE=-system-png at the moment)?

Sure, I didn't test the patch because I use +system-png (it's a forced use) but if you did no problem for me.

We may want to mask system-av1, because system dav1d is still broken with USE=asm

I was hoping the next stable release would happen sooner, but it doesn't look like so: https://code.videolan.org/videolan/dav1d/-/issues/414

Instead of masking system-av1 I think it would be better to backport the patch to system-av1 instead. I'm personally using the live ebuild which is perfectly fine with asm optimizations.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-01-15 17:18 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 8047731
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/9b949f51c2/output.html