dev-libs/gobject-introspection, dev-libs/gobject-introspection-common: Version bump to 1.75.6 BETA

[flint2]

Need mask, in preparation for Gnome 44

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-03-07 00:08 UTC
Newest commit scanned: eb12b0e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1bc7884d6a/output.html

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @flint2
Areas affected: ebuilds, profiles
Packages affected: dev-libs/gobject-introspection, dev-libs/gobject-introspection-common

dev-libs/gobject-introspection: @gentoo/gnome
dev-libs/gobject-introspection-common: @gentoo/gnome

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-03-08 17:03 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 4bc3b83
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7f2cb7967e/output.html

[mattst88]

Dependency glib-2.0 found: NO found 2.74.6 but need: '>=2.75.0'

Please test the PRs. I know some things will slip through, and that's what review is for, but it's not a good use of reviewers' time to catch things like this.

[mattst88]

Please test the PRs. I know some things will slip through, and that's what review is for, but it's not a good use of reviewers' time to catch things like this.

I was probably wrong to suggest that you hadn't tested this—I suspect you did and you just already had glib-2.75.4 installed since you already provided a PR for that. Sorry.

Something to note about gobject-introspection: the minor version should match the glib minor version. E.g. gobject-introspection-1.74 depends on glib-2.74, etc. It's not obvious from the build scripts, but here's the logic that controls it, in gobject-introspection's meson.build:

# Reset to 0 if g-i micro version exceeds GLib's
glib_micro_version = 0  # gi_version[2]
glib_version = '>=2.@0@.@1@'.format(gi_versions[1], glib_micro_version)

glib_dep = dependency('glib-2.0', version: glib_version,
                      default_options: ['tests=false'])

[flint2]

introspection: the minor version should match the glib minor version. E.g. gobject-introspection-1.74 depends on glib-2.74, et

I did a quick test after installing, I've tried to follow the order of https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:GNOME/GNOME_Bumping_Guide#glib for the PRs unless I hit a dependency and needed to change the order.
Will look into gobject-introspection issue later
Thanks!

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-03-10 15:38 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 57262d6
Status: ❌ broken

New issues caused by PR:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/ab72977941/output.html#dev-libs/gobject-introspection

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/ab72977941/output.html

[flint2]

Removed mask, will do a PR with only one commit for masking all Gnome 44 BETA related packages

If glib 1.75 is a dependency, should be included in same PR?

What do you suggest?

[mattst88]

If glib 1.75 is a dependency, should be included in same PR?

What do you suggest?

That's probably a good idea for the future.