New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev-java/batik: avoid file collisions #30431
Conversation
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-04-01 11:23 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-04-01 11:33 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
i guess we need a revbump for this as it affects installed files |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-04-01 16:03 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @vaukai dev-java/batik: @gentoo/java Linked bugsIn order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-04-02 06:48 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Terminal=false | ||
Type=Application | ||
Categories=Graphics;VectorGraphics; | ||
MimeType=image/svg+xml; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need a new file for each bump or could we just tag the existing file and replace the version using sed
from the ebuild?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need a new file for each bump or could we just tag the existing file and replace the version using
sed
from the ebuild?
How should that work if more than one slot is installed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instead of version you put something like %VER%
in the desktop file in files
dir, you can also rename it to *.template
if you want, and during installation you copy the file, sed
the version in the copied file, and then you install the modified file using newmenu
. you can see thunderbird
ebuild for an example.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What I'v seen in ps3mediaserver-1.90.1-r2.ebuild looks promising. Will try that.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/872689 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/903641 Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-04-02 13:43 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/903641