-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dev-java/protobuf-java: add 3.23.0 #30860
Conversation
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-03 16:58 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
java.lang.RuntimeException: Tests data file /google/protobuf/testdata/golden_packed_fields_message is missing. | ||
at com.google.protobuf.TestUtil.readBytesFromResource(TestUtil.java:3848) | ||
at com.google.protobuf.TestUtil.getGoldenPackedFieldsMessage(TestUtil.java:3881) | ||
at com.google.protobuf.CodedOutputStreamTest.testWriteWholePackedFieldsMessage(CodedOutputStreamTest.java:382) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
both these files should be part of a jar so that java can read them as resources. within the jar file the paths should be those as specified in the error. are they really missing from the distributed files or are they just missing in a jar?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. Those files were in a different directory and adding that directory to JAVA_TEST_RESOURCE_DIRS
didn't help. Having them in testdata.jar
finally works
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-04 08:48 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-04 16:38 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-04 18:53 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-05 09:53 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-06 08:53 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-05-08 21:19 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
|
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @vaukai dev-java/protobuf-java: @Arfrever, @gentoo/cjk, @gentoo/java Linked bugsBugs linked: 906811 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-06-27 16:41 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
it depends on dev-java/protobuf-23.0 which is not in the tree yet |
That's the reason why we're building |
ah, well, the mask commit did not apply cleanly so i had to edit it but i might had done that wrongly... |
Higher versions depend on dev-cpp/abseil-cpp-20230125.3 which is not in the tree. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/906811 Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
Signed-off-by: Volkmar W. Pogatzki <gentoo@pogatzki.net>
Sorry for inconvenience. I just rebased and solved the merge conflict. |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-06-28 08:00 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
@vaukai thanks! |
No description provided.