New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sec-keys/openpgp-keys-wireshark: initial import #32575
Conversation
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
5b85fef
to
503c5ec
Compare
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @thesamesam app-crypt/openpgp-keys-wireshark: @gentoo/proxy-maint (new package) Linked bugsBugs linked: 913394 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
cc @mgorny |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-03 05:00 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
503c5ec
to
3e41e67
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-03 05:45 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-03 13:55 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-03 15:25 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-03 17:25 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
verify-sig_verify_signed_checksums \ | ||
"${DISTDIR}"/${P}-signatures.txt \ | ||
sha256 \ | ||
"${DISTDIR}"/${P}.tar.xz |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No cd / openssl-dsgt in this one? Not that it matters in live (yet), but just wondering if an oversight.
Beside that don't really have anything to say from a quick look. I'd probably have considered BASH_REMATCH in the eclass but utimately doesn't change much.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, oversight. I've only modified the one ebuild I needed to test the eclass.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Thanks to ulm for reporting. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/913394 Closes: gentoo#20401 Closes: gentoo#32575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-09-08 10:35 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Signed-off-by: Sam James sam@gentoo.org