dev-java/javassist: add 3.30.2

[vaukai]

No description provided.

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @vaukai
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: dev-java/javassist

dev-java/javassist: @gentoo/java

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 916492

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-10-29 20:32 UTC
Newest commit scanned: fec4cc1
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/f9c3d4043f/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-11-01 17:57 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 995e16a
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/47355bb949/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-11-11 09:52 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 9855653
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/42c3113b96/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-08 13:03 UTC
Newest commit scanned: c0dbb89
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/b0efe99d93/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-16 18:08 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 1aac5c5
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/d3482f322f/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-17 09:18 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 5afc25e
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/459d086b3d/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-17 16:03 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 8c13e5f
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/944c1f9a9a/output.html

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-24 21:38 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 3c7cc92
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/193a45861a/output.html

[vaukai]

@fordfrog regarding my open PRs, this PR please be the next
it solves a blocker: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=916492&hide_resolved=1

[fordfrog]

@fordfrog regarding my open PRs, this PR please be the next it solves a blocker: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=916492&hide_resolved=1

i still need to find some time to have a look at the test issues. do they fail only with our ebuild or they don't work even when using upstream build system?

[vaukai]

@fordfrog regarding my open PRs, this PR please be the next it solves a blocker: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=916492&hide_resolved=1

i still need to find some time to have a look at the test issues. do they fail only with our ebuild or they don't work even when using upstream build system?

running mvn test would pass them all.

[fordfrog]

@fordfrog regarding my open PRs, this PR please be the next it solves a blocker: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=916492&hide_resolved=1

i still need to find some time to have a look at the test issues. do they fail only with our ebuild or they don't work even when using upstream build system?

running mvn test would pass them all.

hm, so it seems they should be fixable

[vaukai]

hm, so it seems they should be fixable

guess yes. but no idea how to :-(

[fordfrog]

hm, so it seems they should be fixable

guess yes. but no idea how to :-(

i'll try to find some time to have a look at it.

[vaukai]

Just rearranged the patches, one for eclass specifics and the other to skip unresolved test failures.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2024-02-07 09:22 UTC
Newest commit scanned: bb526bd
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/9e88fa354f/output.html

[vaukai]

hm, so it seems they should be fixable

guess yes. but no idea how to :-(

i'll try to find some time to have a look at it.

btw: those test excludes are the same as already documented in bug 880719 which is tracked on bug 856409 so it cannot get lost.

[fordfrog]

for this one i still wanna review the tests.

[vaukai]

for this one i still wanna review the tests.

added it as a stabilization blocker: https://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=918647&hide_resolved=1