New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fcitx5: add fcitx5-rime, and upgrade librime #34247
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @bekcpear app-i18n/fcitx-rime: @Arfrever, @dlan17, @gentoo/cjk Linked bugsBugs linked: 760501 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-12-12 15:18 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-12-13 03:47 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
f86339d
to
09fad6e
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-12-13 08:27 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2023-12-13 08:57 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
70a3235
to
acc01f8
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-01-01 16:14 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Rebased to the updated master branch due to the file conflicting with |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-01-01 16:42 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Upgrade fcitx-rime:5 to 5.1.4 Due to the icon files renamed, removing the conflicting with fcitx-rime:4. |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-01-04 15:57 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/760501 Signed-off-by: Ryan Qian <i@bitbili.net>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Qian <i@bitbili.net>
Give up upgrading the rime-data. |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-01-08 07:38 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Closes: gentoo#34247 Signed-off-by: Ryan Qian <i@bitbili.net> Signed-off-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>
Upgrade fcitx-rime to version 5
, it conflicts with fcitx-rime:4 due to the icons.Also add a new slot 'essay' for rime-data with a newer version.The previous repo 'brise' for rime-data is deprecated as of Apr, 2018. However, the new rime-data is spread over several repositories, and most of them does not have a release version (including essential data). So I have to use a different slot to make it possible to select this rime-data which has a fake version number (0.0.0.[date]) that satisfies Semantic Versioning.The package name prefix is suggested by the upstream: https://github.com/rime/plum#install-as-shared-datatree:The rime-cantonese input schema is not added here duo to the ODbL license is not included in gentoo yet, this input schema may be added in the future.upgrade app-i18n/librime to 1.9.0
This upgrade skipped over a minor version, and the time span was too long, so only the ~amd64 and ~x86 keywords are kept.