app-editors/jedit: switch to java-pkg-simple.eclass

[vaukai]

Switching from java-ant-2 to java-pkg-simple allows dropping dependency on ant-contrib with further 45 dependencies.

Builds internal documentation with xmltproc populating /usr/share/jedit/lib/doc/{FAQ,tips,users-guide,whatsnew}.

Adds dependency on docbook-xsl-stylesheets which is needed for processing xref in the xml files in the users-guide directory.

Still missing users-guide/toc.xml

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/904034

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @vaukai
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: app-editors/jedit

app-editors/jedit: @gentoo/java

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 904034

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2023-12-31 14:07 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 7462e65
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/0af168bb23/output.html

[fordfrog]

what the content of that zip file should be? it might be deduced from the build.xml. maybe it just wants to unpack something that we already have in the tree in another package and symlinking the files instead might be enough.

[vaukai]

what the content of that zip file should be? it might be deduced from the build.xml. maybe it just wants to unpack something that we already have in the tree in another package and symlinking the files instead might be enough.

bug 904034 was about the old version built with java-ant-2.

In the new version rewritten using java-pkg-simple the absence of that zip file is solved by BDEPEND on app-text/docbook-xsl-stylesheets:0 and symlinking:

ln -s /usr/share/sgml/docbook/ . || die

After finishing the new version I tried that also with the old version. It took me a tiny step further there but didn't completely solve that bug. I decided to not continue building it with java-ant-2.
A TODO with reference to http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/Xinclude.html#d0e40343 for a future project is commented in the ebuild.
After stabilization of the new version we could probably save some work by making ant-ivy PMASKED together with ant-contrib and if ever needed again, then later re-add apache-ivy with an up-to-date package name.

[fordfrog]

After stabilization of the new version we could probably save some work by making ant-ivy PMASKED together with ant-contrib and if ever needed again, then later re-add apache-ivy with an up-to-date package name.

ivy is an end user tool so it would be better to preserve it.