autotools move to dev-build, pt. 2: macros

[mgorny]

• xfce4-dev-tools @gentoo/xfce
• boost-m4 (no maintainer)
• gtk-doc-am @gentoo/gnome

Other potential candidates (that I didn't move because they seem fine in their domain-specific categories):

• dev-ml/ocaml-autoconf (no maintainer)
• x11-misc/util-macros (@gentoo/x11)

[gentoo-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @mgorny
Areas affected: ebuilds, eclasses, profiles
Packages affected: app-cdr/brasero, app-editors/gnome-latex, app-editors/pluma, app-i18n/tomoe, app-i18n/tomoe-gtk...

@gentoo/github: Too many disjoint maintainers, disabling auto-assignment.

Linked bugs

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment.

If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers.

---

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2024-01-15 16:53 UTC
Newest commit scanned: f7694e8
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/cdf620acfc/output.html