Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

media-libs/hamlib: Fix implicit declaration of function exit #35077

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

listout
Copy link
Contributor

@listout listout commented Jan 29, 2024

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923108
Signed-off-by: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @listout
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: media-libs/hamlib

media-libs/hamlib: @dl1jbe

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 923108


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Jan 29, 2024
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2024-01-29 17:13 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 7137a88
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/1846dc7fe5/output.html

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
diff --git a/tests/memload.c b/tests/memload.c
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sent upstream?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, and still not.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thesamesam Do we need some sort of required status check for modifications to files/* that the PR author acknowledges the patch has been sent upstream?

@listout

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR.
Projects
None yet
5 participants