New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup cmake.eclass EAPI-7 stragglers #35651
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-07 11:18 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-07 13:52 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-24 21:21 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-25 12:00 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @a17r dev-db/pgrouting: @gentoo/postgresql At least one of the listed packages is maintained entirely by non-GitHub developers! Linked bugsBugs linked: 926345 In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-26 12:30 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Current libobjc2 2.2 looks good and has up-to-date EAPI, just note on patches cleanup
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-27 13:35 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Personally I'm OK to remove the old glm version, but I have not done because is stable and I have not tested all the reverse deps.
Actually if one of these fails during build is just one liner fix:
add
#define GLM_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL
at the begin of each failing source.
The only reported failure with that was recently fixed and is currently pending stabilisation, I'm not going to drop the old version before that is done: https://bugs.gentoo.org/927790 |
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926345 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-03-28 23:25 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
In the year 2024 we do not bump new ebuilds as EAPI-7. Please.