Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

=app-pda/usbmuxd-1.1.1: Cap app-pda/libplist version to <2.3 #35853

Closed

Conversation

BalkanMadman
Copy link
Contributor

This solves compile errors due to new plist.h being used by not-yet-updated usbmuxd 1.1.1

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926999

This solves compile errors due to new plist.h being used by
not-yet-updated usbmuxd 1.1.1

Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/926999
Signed-off-by: BalkanMadman <zurabid2016@gmail.com>
@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Submitter: @BalkanMadman
Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: app-pda/usbmuxd

app-pda/usbmuxd: @BalkanMadman, @gentoo/proxy-maint

Linked bugs

Bugs linked: 926999


In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

Docs: Code of ConductCopyright policy (expl.) ● DevmanualGitHub PRsProxy-maint guide

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else) assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. labels Mar 21, 2024
@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2024-03-21 14:08 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 026f700
Status: ✅ good

There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question:
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/6e9ebb2472/output.html

@MatthewGentoo
Copy link
Member

MatthewGentoo commented Mar 25, 2024

Could we backport the patches that makes it work with 2.3.0?

libimobiledevice/usbmuxd@049877e
libimobiledevice/usbmuxd@01c94c7

@BalkanMadman
Copy link
Contributor Author

I suppose we could do this in the next revision

@MatthewGentoo
Copy link
Member

MatthewGentoo commented Apr 2, 2024

Since -r2 has this change and your other fixes, do you want to submit a stablereq for -r2, and we can just drop -r0?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). bug linked Bug/Closes found in footer, and cross-linked with the PR. self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else)
Projects
None yet
4 participants