New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inline mirror://sourceforge #36198
Inline mirror://sourceforge #36198
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @antecrescent @gentoo/github: Too many disjoint maintainers, disabling auto-assignment. Linked bugsNo bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment. If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-04-10 19:19 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
Let's split eclass changes into separate commits. |
bump copyright to 2024 Signed-off-by: Lucio Sauer <watermanpaint@posteo.net>
bump copyright to 2024 Signed-off-by: Lucio Sauer <watermanpaint@posteo.net>
bump copyright of touched ebuilds to 2024 Signed-off-by: Lucio Sauer <watermanpaint@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: Lucio Sauer <watermanpaint@posteo.net>
I asked the maintainer of Thanks for the review! |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-04-12 11:11 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
You don't really need to wait before sending patches to the ml. Since this thing is bound to get outdated all the time, here's what I propose: let's get eclass changes sent to the ml ASAP, wait a bit, and then I'll push them, redo your |
Sounds good! |
Just for the heck of it, here's a more efficient incantation.
|
What's the current status of this PR? I'd be happy to help fix miscellaneous issues that pop up with
In the meantime, I'll start fixing issues in my inline_sf_pkgcheck branch. |
Oh, sorry about it. I'm going to try doing it now. I suppose the eclass changes cooked long enough on the ml. |
That said, lots of these packages don't use canonical sourceforge URIs but instead rely on redirects but that's a separate issue to tackle. |
See gentoo/gentoo#36198 for the sed invocation. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org>
Closes #13105 as discussed there.
Also mass-bumps copyright of touched files (due to
pkgdev commit
).Generated in a git-cleaned repo with: