New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mesa gles2 drop fix #36624
Mesa gles2 drop fix #36624
Conversation
Pull Request assignmentSubmitter: @PeakKS @gentoo/github: Too many disjoint maintainers, disabling auto-assignment. Linked bugsNo bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and request reassignment. If you do not receive any reply to this pull request, please open or link a bug to attract the attention of maintainers. In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append Docs: Code of Conduct ● Copyright policy (expl.) ● Devmanual ● GitHub PRs ● Proxy-maint guide |
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-05-10 02:29 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ REQUIRED_USE=" | |||
# Dependencies needed by opengl library and plugin (enabled via USE gles2 and/or opengl) | |||
# dmabuf automagic from libdrm headers (drm_fourcc.h) and EGL, so ensure it with USE=egl (platform independent header used only, thus no MULTILIB_USEDEP); provides dmabuf based upload/download/eglimage options | |||
GL_DEPS=" | |||
>=media-libs/mesa-9.0[egl(+)?,gbm(+)?,gles2?,wayland?,${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] | |||
>=media-libs/mesa-9.0[egl(+)?,gbm(+)?,gles2(+)?,wayland?,${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this might need to be a opengl
USE dep instead now?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm yeah, for some reason I could have sworn it said -Dgles2=true
last night but I guess I was just fried.
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
f323d8d
to
8dbf9ce
Compare
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: PeakKS <bbatson101@gmail.com>
8dbf9ce
to
14de3eb
Compare
Pull request CI reportReport generated at: 2024-05-17 01:45 UTC There are existing issues already. Please look into the report to make sure none of them affect the packages in question: |
This would need revisions for all these afaik? Otherwise a user who wanted the new mesa would have to around manually rebuilding all these packages. https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html "Examples of changes that warrant a new revision are: ... * updating a dependency with default on/off USE flags," |
Fixes builds with a bunch of packages when mesa does not have the gles2 use flag (currently only mesa-9999)
see bug #929992
see commit 847bd60
Please check all the boxes that apply:
Signed-off-by
line to every commit in the pull request.pkgcheck scan --commits --net
to check for issues with my commits.Please note that all boxes must be checked for the pull request to be merged.