lxqt 0.10 version bump

[PPed72]

Just pushing Alpha Bravo's changes in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=564718 and https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=565952 since they've been there for a week and nothing happened yet.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7754095/9.html#l1631
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7754095/10.html#l1826
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7754095/10.html#l1856

Please note that the issues may come from the underlying Gentoo repository state rather than the pull request itself.

[monsieurp]

Hi and thank you for you PR. LGTM except the messages format. Could you reformat your commit messages and instead write "package/category: message" ? That'd helpful. Thanks!

[monsieurp]

@jauhien

[PPed72]

In data Wednesday 25 November 2015 00:45:28, monsieurp ha scritto:

Hi and thank you for you PR. LGTM except the messages format. Could you
reformat your commit messages and instead write "package/category: message"

Shouldn't it be "category/package", like "lxqt-base/lxqt-meta"?

? That'd helpful. Thanks!

I'll do that, probably tomorrow.

Thanks.

Paolo Pedroni
paolo.pedroniiol.it

[PPed72]

Changed all the commit messages. Are they OK, now? Thanks for the attention

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2c1b8e5/9.html#l1631
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2c1b8e5/10.html#l1826
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/2c1b8e5/10.html#l1856

Please note that the issues may come from the underlying Gentoo repository state rather than the pull request itself.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7c7f0d1/9.html#l1631
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7c7f0d1/10.html#l1826
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7c7f0d1/10.html#l1855

Please note that the issues may come from the underlying Gentoo repository state rather than the pull request itself.

[jauhien]

Hi,

I'm busy at the moment and also have problems with my computer. Could you, please, ping somebody else from the lxqt herd?

[monsieurp]

Thank for the PR @PPed72. Unfortunately, there are still errors that are to be looked after.

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/7c7f0d1/10.html#l1826

Something's up with the ~arm keyword, lxqt-base/lxqt-config and lxqt-base/lxqt-panel. Could you please make sure all ebuilds are keyworded correctly and your PR is not generating errors? Thanks!

[PPed72]

kde-frameworks/solid and kde-plasma/libkscreen have no keywords for arm. I'm going to drop arm and arm64 for the moment

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/886233f/9.html#l1631

Please note that the issues may come from the underlying Gentoo repository state rather than the pull request itself.

[monsieurp]

Thanks a lot. PR merged. 👍