net-misc/sstp-client: Version bump to 2.0.11

[mjeveritt]

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.6, Repoman-2.3.1

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

Pull Request assignment

Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: net-misc/sstp-client

net-misc/sstp-client: @mjeveritt, @maksbotan, @gentoo/proxy-maint

[mgorny]

 * ERROR: net-misc/sstp-client-1.0.11::gentoo failed (test phase):
 *   Make check failed. See above for details.

FAIL: utest_route
=================

Could not get route
FAIL utest_route (exit status: 1)

[mjeveritt]

@mgorny : Emerge.log and build.log please. Tia.

[mgorny]

Enable FEATURES=network-sandbox test and see for yourself. Ofc, you should've done that in the first place.

[mjeveritt]

@mgorny : funny that, it worked with FEATURES="test".

Perhaps you can point me to the policy document which details what tests a maintainer should be running for his packages ... I appear to have missed it. Either that, or my testing environment is lacking some setting ..
As a QA representative, this should be quite a trivial request ...

[mgorny]

https://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_test/index.html

The big section on network access.

Also, please cut your snarky comments. They are not welcome here, or anywhere else in Gentoo, and you have been warned multiple times.

[mjeveritt]

Also, please cut your snarky comments. They are not welcome here, or anywhere else in Gentoo, and you have been warned multiple times.

Funny that .. seems to be par for the course for anyone with an @ .. yourself especially. Perhaps leading a good example might get you a bit further than your normal bullying tactics. Besides, what you gonna do anyway, ComRel me, or just ban me from Github .. and what's that gonna achieve? Nadda, yes.

[gentoo-repo-qa-bot]

👍 All QA issues have been fixed!