games-emulation/ppsspp: bug fix #572606 #740
Conversation
|
😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues: Issues persisted from underlying repository state: |
|
@monsieurp |
|
@RobinDX: I told you a zillion times that you only need to push your changes onto the branch you've created when sending the PR for the bot to pick them up again and rerun the QA tests; in the case of this PR: |
|
Since this fix modifies the install path of the ppsspp binary, we have to create a new revision. Please, undo your changes in both ebuilds and create two new revisions, namely ppsspp-1.1.0-r1.ebuild and ppsspp-1.1.1-r1.ebuild with your fix in it. Cheers. |
monsieurp
added
bugfix
assigned
|
and DO NOT close this PR and send a new one! 😠 |
|
@monsieurp |
|
@RobinDX, please rebase your commits against fresh repository. This pull request is based on pre-GLEP67 ::gentoo repository which triggers so many QA issues that the script fails with lack of resources to process them all. Otherwise, it would throw around 18k errors here ;-P. |
…ver into proper directory (bug #534152) Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26 RepoMan-Options: --ignore-arches
… in the .ebuild Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26 RepoMan-Options: --ignore-arches
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
…(bug #572730 by Martijn Schmidt). Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
…(bug #572730 by Martijn Schmidt). Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
…(bug #572730 by Martijn Schmidt). Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
…72854). Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Lars Wendler <polynomial-c@gentoo.org>
Do not define SRC_URI and S (which was the default). Convert latex-package_has_tetex_3() to a dummy function for backwards compatibility and remove its documentation.
In EAPI 6, don't inherit base.eclass and don't define latex-package_has_tetex_3().
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
…0} - remove old. Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26 Signed-off-by: Agostino Sarubbo <ago@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
Gentoo-Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573372 Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
revbump uses new SRC_URI fetching an adjusted tarball with a pre-built set of docs; add IUSE doc and doc install in the usual form Also bump to EAPI 6, patch submitted by E. Myers via the gentoo bug Gentoo bug: #573316 Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
case statement ignored EAPI > 5 Gentoo-Bugs: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573368 Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher <jlec@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.26
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27 Signed-off-by: Alexis Ballier <aballier@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
Package-Manager: portage-2.2.27
|
@mgorny |
|
I think I have do something wrong with git rebase. |
|
😞 The QA check for this pull request has found the following issues: New issues: |
Fix https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572606