Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

games-rpg/baldurs-gate-ee: bump to 2.5.23121 #9747

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

diogocp
Copy link
Contributor

@diogocp diogocp commented Aug 31, 2018

No description provided.

@gentoo-bot
Copy link

Pull Request assignment

Areas affected: ebuilds
Packages affected: games-rpg/baldurs-gate-ee

games-rpg/baldurs-gate-ee: @diogocp, @gentoo/proxy-maint

No bugs to link found. If your pull request references any of the Gentoo bug reports, please add appropriate GLEP 66 tags to the commit message and ping us to reset the assignment.

In order to force reassignment and/or bug reference scan, please append [please reassign] to the pull request title.

@gentoo-bot gentoo-bot added self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else) assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). labels Aug 31, 2018

inherit eutils unpacker
inherit desktop eutils unpacker
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please drop eutils and unpacker (you can drop probably src_unpack() as well?)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

eutils is required for make_wrapper.

Without unpacker the file is not recognized. With unpacker but no explicit unpack_zip, unpacking fails. I could use unzip directly, but unpack_zip seems better. This was also discussed before.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, thanks.

media-libs/openal[abi_x86_32(-)]
virtual/opengl[abi_x86_32(-)]
x11-libs/libX11[abi_x86_32(-)]"
RDEPEND="dev-libs/expat
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

aren't you missing [${MULTILIB_USEDEP}] on all those?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that is necessary. This new version includes both x86 and amd64 binaries.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

but then you need to make sure that the dependencies are built for these ABIs as well?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want this package to have "multilib" support. It's an application, so I only want to install it for the native ABI. AFAIK the native ABI is implied in dependency specifications that do not explicitly specify another one.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah, yeah. I misinterpreted your previous message, but the ebuild code makes it clear anyway.

Copy link
Member

@mgorny mgorny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please split removal from adding new version. Also, do you think it would be worthwhile to keep the old version for a few days just in case?

Package-Manager: Portage-2.3.49, Repoman-2.3.10
@diogocp
Copy link
Contributor Author

diogocp commented Sep 21, 2018

I kept the old version for now.

@gentoo-repo-qa-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request CI report

Report generated at: 2018-09-21 12:16 UTC
Newest commit scanned: 40ff633
Status: ✅ good

No issues found

Copy link
Member

@mgorny mgorny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assigned PR successfully assigned to the package maintainer(s). self-maintained The PR changes only packages that are maintained by the submitter (i.e. no need to ask anybody else)
Projects
None yet
5 participants