dev-qt/qtwaylandscanner split #250
Conversation
I've seen worse ;) |
Several revdeps do not need the full qtwayland at all, and qtwaylandscanner would be in BDEPEND analogous to wayland-scanner. Afaik barely anything makes use of qtwaylandcompositor, which would be really nice to be able to split off. |
| @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ DEPEND=" | |||
| x11-libs/libXcomposite | |||
| ) | |||
| " | |||
| RDEPEND="${DEPEND}" | |||
| RDEPEND="${DEPEND} | |||
| =dev-qt/qtwaylandscanner-${QT5_PV}*:5 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could use the 5.15.3 bump as a way to communicate this dependency being dropped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Dropped dependency and will make it part of the initial package.mask message and/or gentoo-dev mail.
| KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~sparc ~x86" | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| SLOT=5 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I suppose this will move to the eclass later? (related to #225)
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.28, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.30, Repoman-3.0.3 Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner <asturm@gentoo.org>
Sort of a messy split, but I did not quite know how else to do it.
Ideally we would be able to split off the compositor but that is rather tricky.