Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix some typos #2673

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2018
Merged

Fix some typos #2673

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2018

Conversation

gassmoeller
Copy link
Member

Some fixes for #2574, nothing critical, just things I noticed but did not want to delay the PR further for.

@MFraters: When I updated the world builder submodule git commited the change to the version of the submodule as well. Does that mean we need to manually update the submodule every time we want to have a newer version of the world build? Or the other way around: Does the version of the world build in ASPECT stay the same if we do not update it? I guess this ties into #2613, and we should continue the discussion there at some point in the future, but here I was just curious. I can remove the update to the world builder when that is wanted, but the current version of the world build that is part of ASPECT has some serious bugs (like it returns the composition as a bool instead of a double), so maybe we want to keep the update in this PR?

@tjhei
Copy link
Member

tjhei commented Sep 26, 2018

Does that mean we need to manually update the submodule every time we want to have a newer version of the world build?

Yes, a submodule references a specific commit hash. This means the title of this PR is not quite fitting.

@gassmoeller
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, I removed the world builder update. Only typos now, and should be ready to merge when the testers are happy.

"More information on the World Builder can be found at "
"https://geodynamicworldbuilder.github.io ."
"https://geodynamicworldbuilder.github.io. "
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the space after "io" is probably there so that is it not seen as part of the url. How are we handling URLs in parameters, anyway? With or without {url}?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I do not think there is a policy yet, but including links is reasonable. I have checked that \url works in the pdf, and included it.

@tjhei tjhei merged commit 986218c into geodynamics:master Sep 26, 2018
@gassmoeller gassmoeller deleted the fix_some_typos branch September 27, 2018 00:39
freddrichards pushed a commit to freddrichards/aspect that referenced this pull request May 20, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants