[Backport 2023.02.xx]: Handling GetFeatureInfo exceptions parameter format configuration (#9471) #9562
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nfiguration Desription: - put a default format for GFI exceptions - add getIdentifyFlow to catch GFI errors and exceptions * geosolutions-it#9466: resolve reviewer comments Description: fix unit test failing results, create new unit test for getIdentifyFlow for wms * resolve review comments add test cases for getIdentifyFlow in wms-test * geosolutions-it#9466: resolve review comments edit in wms-test of mapInfo file by adding a unit test for exception * geosolutions-it#9466: resolve eslint errors in unit test * geosolutions-it#9466: add unit test for a exception response in string format for mapInfo/wms-test
MV88
approved these changes
Oct 5, 2023
|
@ElenaGallo please test in QA |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Backort of #9471 for [2023.02.xx]
Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
What kind of change does this PR introduce? (check one with "x", remove the others)
What is the current behavior?
What is the new behavior?
Breaking change
Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (check one with "x", remove the other)
Other useful information