Adding Codecov for Test Coverage to CircleCI yaml #1462
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yanokwa
approved these changes
Sep 14, 2017
shobhitagarwal1612
added a commit
to shobhitagarwal1612/collect
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2018
* Adds codecov badge to README * Modifies circle yaml * Adds jacoco plugin * Update README.md
snavarreteimmap
pushed a commit
to snavarreteimmap/collect
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2020
* Adds codecov badge to README * Modifies circle yaml * Adds jacoco plugin * Update README.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Integrates CodeCov to CircleCI as a part of automatic building process
What has been done to verify that this works as intended?
Successfully implemented it on the forked repo
Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?
Codecov was decided as a better option as discussed on the forum
Are there any risks to merging this code? If so, what are they?
Maybe. We can also include a local yaml for customizing more settings. more info