-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cli: add --dry-run option to 'popper run' #509
Labels
Comments
@akashrajr1 For example, for this workflow, the output looks like this:
For this issue, we can print a
this would let the user know that nothing got executed, just printed. |
akashrajr1
added a commit
to akashrajr1/popper
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2019
Does a dry run of a workflow Resolves issue getpopper#509
akashrajr1
added a commit
to akashrajr1/popper
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2019
Does a dry run of a workflow Resolves issue getpopper#509
akashrajr1
added a commit
to akashrajr1/popper
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2019
Does a dry run of a workflow Resolves issue getpopper#509
akashrajr1
added a commit
to akashrajr1/popper
that referenced
this issue
Mar 13, 2019
Does a dry run of a workflow Resolves issue getpopper#509
akashrajr1
added a commit
to akashrajr1/popper
that referenced
this issue
Mar 18, 2019
Does a dry run of a workflow Resolves issue getpopper#509 fix pep8 --dry-run review changes Dry run is no longer in a seperate module, and has been integrated in the gha module Fix a build issue Bad import statement fix pep8
ivotron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 24, 2020
Adds a --dry-run flag to the 'popper run' command fixes #509
ivotron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2020
Adds a --dry-run flag to the 'popper run' command fixes #509
ivotron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2020
Adds a --dry-run flag to the 'popper run' command fixes #509
ivotron
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 25, 2020
Adds a --dry-run flag to the 'popper run' command fixes #509
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add a
--dry-run
option that just prints what the workflow would look like without actually executing itThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: