rfc(feature): Exception Groups

README.md

@@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ This repository contains RFCs and DACIs. Lost?
 - [0070-document-sensitive-data-collected](text/0070-document-sensitive-data-collected.md): Document sensitive data collected
 - [0071-continue-trace-over-process-boundaries](text/0071-continue-trace-over-process-boundaries.md): Continue trace over process boundaries
 - [0072-kafka-schema-registry](text/0072-kafka-schema-registry.md): Kafka Schema Registry
+- [0079-exception-groups](text/0079-exception-groups.md): Exception Groups

text/0079-exception-groups.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+- Start Date: 2023-03-06
+- RFC Type: feature
+- RFC PR: https://github.com/getsentry/rfcs/pull/79
+- RFC Status: draft
+
+# Summary
+
+One paragraph explanation of the feature or document purpose.
+
+# Motivation
+
+Why are we doing this? What use cases does it support? What is the expected outcome?
+
+# Background
+
+The reason this decision or document is required. This section might not always exist.
+
+# Supporting Data
+
+[Metrics to help support your decision (if applicable).]
+
+# Options Considered
+
+If an RFC does not know yet what the options are, it can propose multiple options. The
+preferred model is to propose one option and to provide alternatives.
+
+# Drawbacks
+
+Why should we not do this? What are the drawbacks of this RFC or a particular option if
+multiple options are presented.
+
+# Unresolved questions
+
+- What parts of the design do you expect to resolve through this RFC?
+- What issues are out of scope for this RFC but are known?