Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upstream: Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements (#1155) #138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024

Conversation

billyvg
Copy link
Member

@billyvg billyvg commented Dec 8, 2023

cherry-picks rrweb-io#1155 which was merged in our fork in #107 (prior to rrweb-io#1155 being merged). This results in only 2 small stylistic changes.

Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements rrweb-io#1155

…nts (rrweb-io#1155)

* Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements

* add isCustom flag to serialized elements

Applying Justin's review suggestion

* fix code lint error

* add custom element event

* fix: tests (rrweb-io#1348)

* Update packages/rrweb/src/record/observer.ts

* Update packages/rrweb/src/record/observer.ts

---------

Co-authored-by: Nafees Nehar <nafees87n@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Justin Halsall <Juice10@users.noreply.github.com>
@billyvg billyvg changed the title Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements (#1155) sync: Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements (#1155) Dec 8, 2023
@billyvg billyvg changed the title sync: Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements (#1155) upstream: Feat: Add support for replaying :defined pseudo-class of custom elements (#1155) Dec 8, 2023
@billyvg billyvg marked this pull request as ready for review December 12, 2023 21:35
@billyvg billyvg requested a review from a team January 31, 2024 17:16
@billyvg billyvg merged commit 120e802 into sentry-v2 Jan 31, 2024
14 checks passed
@billyvg billyvg deleted the feat-merge-upstream-defined-pseudo-class branch January 31, 2024 18:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants