Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update geoipupdate to 5.1.1 #2236

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023
Merged

Update geoipupdate to 5.1.1 #2236

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

williamdes
Copy link
Contributor

I have read all changelogs between the two versions:

Since https://github.com/maxmind/geoipupdate/releases/tag/v4.8.0 there is two new ENVs to avoid overriding the entrypoint
@chadwhitacre you did comment on #766 back in the day https://github.com/getsentry/self-hosted/pull/766/files#diff-e45e45baeda1c1e73482975a664062aa56f20c03dd9d64a827aba57775bed0d3
Should we use ENVs now ?

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. and is gonna need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this here PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

Should we use ENVs now?

Seems reasonable. maxmind/geoipupdate#143 does look like it addresses our use-case directly. :)

@chadwhitacre chadwhitacre merged commit f737864 into getsentry:master Jul 6, 2023
6 checks passed
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the contribution, @williamdes! :)

@williamdes williamdes deleted the bump-geoipupdate branch July 7, 2023 08:54
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 23, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants