Fix crash on double SDK init #2679

stefanosiano · 2023-04-27T15:13:36Z

📜 Description

all calls to ISentryExecutorService are now wrapped in a try catch block
closing the hub will close the profiler and the performance collector

💡 Motivation and Context

Calling init() multiple times closes any previous instance of the SDK.
After closing, any call to the executor service which was previously scheduled resulted in a crash due to RejectedExecutionException.
Fixes #2493

💚 How did you test it?

Unit and ui test

📝 Checklist

I reviewed the submitted code.
I added tests to verify the changes.
No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPII is enabled.
I updated the docs if needed.
Review from the native team if needed.
No breaking change or entry added to the changelog.
No breaking change for hybrid SDKs or communicated to hybrid SDKs.

🔮 Next steps

closing the hub will close the profiler and the performance collector added ui test for double init

stefanosiano · 2023-04-27T15:18:50Z

sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Hub.java

+                  span.setSpanFinishedCallback(null);
+                  span.finish(SpanStatus.CANCELLED);
+                }
+                transaction.finish(SpanStatus.CANCELLED);


Is it right to close the current transaction?
Also, should we think about closing any other manual transaction started by the user?
Transactions keep a reference to the old options, and so to the executor service, possibly leading to a crash. In reality all calls are now wrapped in try catch blocks, so it's a non-issue.
It's more to understand if it makes sense to stop the transactions from a end user perspective

I think it makes sense, especially for Mobile. @adinauer does this seem right for you as well?

we are dropping canceling the transaction for the moment, as we have to be careful on the backend use case.
Worst case we will show some errors in the logs, pointing at a possible Sentry.close() previous call.
In another pr we will reevaluate cancelling the current transactions.

github-actions · 2023-04-27T15:31:54Z

Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	295.15 ms	336.50 ms	41.35 ms
Size	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	553.71 KiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
`33c80c7`	331.94 ms	370.54 ms	38.60 ms
`d81684e`	235.73 ms	328.76 ms	93.03 ms
`17ab223`	427.65 ms	484.31 ms	56.65 ms
`33c80c7`	318.88 ms	348.14 ms	29.26 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
`33c80c7`	1.73 MiB	2.26 MiB	551.46 KiB
`d81684e`	1.73 MiB	2.26 MiB	547.78 KiB
`17ab223`	1.73 MiB	2.34 MiB	626.85 KiB
`33c80c7`	1.73 MiB	2.26 MiB	551.46 KiB

Previous results on branch: fix/multiple-sdk-init

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
`06cb003`	280.50 ms	319.10 ms	38.60 ms
`8899387`	327.19 ms	381.38 ms	54.19 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
`06cb003`	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	553.71 KiB
`8899387`	1.72 MiB	2.26 MiB	553.62 KiB

markushi

Looking good already, please have a look at my comments!

markushi · 2023-04-28T08:07:27Z

sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Hub.java

+                  span.setSpanFinishedCallback(null);
+                  span.finish(SpanStatus.CANCELLED);
+                }
+                transaction.finish(SpanStatus.CANCELLED);


I think it makes sense, especially for Mobile. @adinauer does this seem right for you as well?

sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Hub.java

markushi · 2023-04-28T08:12:54Z

...on-tests/sentry-uitest-android/src/androidTest/java/io/sentry/uitest/android/SdkInitTests.kt

+        transaction.finish()
+        sampleScenario.moveToState(Lifecycle.State.DESTROYED)
+        val transaction2 = Sentry.startTransaction("e2etests", "testInit")
+        transaction2.finish()


Nice! I think there's one more test to cover which would fail right now: Initializing the SDK with the same options twice.

val options = {} Sentry.init(options) Sentry.close() Sentry.init(options)

I guess the solution here would be to re-init the executor-service in .init()

profiling is now stopped on executorService exceptions transaction bound to the scope is not cancelled automatically anymore on Sentry.close() ISentryExecutorService is re-init in Sentry.init if it was shutdown

codecov · 2023-04-28T13:59:06Z

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 89.13% and project coverage change: +0.04 🎉

Comparison is base (544da32) 81.28% compared to head (c0607ab) 81.33%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2679      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     81.28%   81.33%   +0.04%     
- Complexity     4263     4271       +8     
============================================
  Files           337      337              
  Lines         15759    15795      +36     
  Branches       2080     2083       +3     
============================================
+ Hits          12810    12847      +37     
+ Misses         2128     2125       -3     
- Partials        821      823       +2

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Sentry.java	`83.66% <80.00%> (+0.67%)`	⬆️
...sentry/DefaultTransactionPerformanceCollector.java	`91.54% <89.47%> (-1.18%)`	⬇️
sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Hub.java	`76.99% <100.00%> (+0.16%)`	⬆️
...main/java/io/sentry/NoOpSentryExecutorService.java	`85.71% <100.00%> (+52.38%)`	⬆️
...io/sentry/NoOpTransactionPerformanceCollector.java	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...c/main/java/io/sentry/NoOpTransactionProfiler.java	`100.00% <100.00%> (ø)`
...ry/SendCachedEnvelopeFireAndForgetIntegration.java	`68.08% <100.00%> (+2.96%)`	⬆️
...src/main/java/io/sentry/SentryExecutorService.java	`95.23% <100.00%> (+0.50%)`	⬆️

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

markushi

Nice, looks good to me!

romtsn · 2023-05-02T07:35:04Z

sentry/src/main/java/io/sentry/Hub.java

@@ -339,6 +339,10 @@ public void close() {
            ((Closeable) integration).close();
          }
        }
+
+        withScope(scope -> scope.clear());


late to the party, but this is not gonna do much, because withScope will duplicate the scope, and then we're trying to clear the duplicated scope, but the main scope stays untouched. This should be changed to configureScope. I think we need a custom lint rule to never use withScope on mobile 😅 this is the second time we introduced something like this (this one is not as severe though).

stefanosiano added 2 commits April 27, 2023 17:10

all calls to ISentryExecutorService are now wrapped in a try catch block

960fd20

closing the hub will close the profiler and the performance collector added ui test for double init

updated changelog

6af6003

stefanosiano commented Apr 27, 2023

View reviewed changes

stefanosiano marked this pull request as ready for review April 27, 2023 15:19

stefanosiano requested review from adinauer, romtsn and markushi as code owners April 27, 2023 15:19

updated exception description

2914bec

markushi requested changes Apr 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

stefanosiano added 2 commits April 28, 2023 15:25

added ISentryExecutorService.close internal method

7e1be4f

profiling is now stopped on executorService exceptions transaction bound to the scope is not cancelled automatically anymore on Sentry.close() ISentryExecutorService is re-init in Sentry.init if it was shutdown

Merge branch 'main' into fix/multiple-sdk-init

997f4e3

markushi approved these changes Apr 28, 2023

View reviewed changes

added tests for codecov

c0607ab

stefanosiano merged commit 64bd675 into main Apr 28, 2023
17 checks passed

stefanosiano deleted the fix/multiple-sdk-init branch April 28, 2023 16:14

romtsn reviewed May 2, 2023

View reviewed changes

romtsn mentioned this pull request May 2, 2023

Fix Hub.close using withScope and not configureScope #2688

Merged

7 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Fix crash on double SDK init #2679

Fix crash on double SDK init #2679

stefanosiano commented Apr 27, 2023

stefanosiano Apr 27, 2023

markushi Apr 28, 2023

stefanosiano Apr 28, 2023

github-actions bot commented Apr 27, 2023 •

edited

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

App size

Previous results on branch: fix/multiple-sdk-init

Startup times

App size

markushi left a comment

markushi Apr 28, 2023

markushi Apr 28, 2023

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2023 •

edited

markushi left a comment

romtsn May 2, 2023

Fix crash on double SDK init #2679

Fix crash on double SDK init #2679

Conversation

stefanosiano commented Apr 27, 2023

📜 Description

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

🔮 Next steps

stefanosiano Apr 27, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

markushi Apr 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

stefanosiano Apr 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Apr 27, 2023 • edited

Performance metrics 🚀

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

App size

Previous results on branch: fix/multiple-sdk-init

Startup times

App size

markushi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

markushi Apr 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

markushi Apr 28, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2023 • edited

Codecov Report

markushi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

romtsn May 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

github-actions bot commented Apr 27, 2023 •

edited

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2023 •

edited