Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chris Morgan’s whole bunch of miscellaneous work for landing #994

Merged
merged 11 commits into from Apr 21, 2020

Conversation

chris-morgan
Copy link
Contributor

This contains the requested parts of #986. That is, excluding the author metadata field and my replace_all filter.

Miscellaneous documentation fixes, template normalisation, Atom feeds and related variable changes and additions, a metadata field for when the page was last updated.

Open questions/remaining work: (per commit messages)

  • updated needs tests
  • Should updated be treated as defaulting to date rather than None? (Mostly affects templates, but also affects data model conceptually.)

Whitespace is not allowed between the `]` and `(`.
It doesn’t have a field named slug.

It does have a field named lang.
The HTML spec doesn’t require it, and I prefer to omit it. This has been
bothering me for ages, but I hadn’t gotten round to fixing it yet.

This can cause nominally invalid HTML to be emitted, if `</body>` was
omitted but `</html>` was present, but that’s unlikely to happen, and
this is for development purposes only, and the right thing will happen
anyway in all environments (per browser behaviour and spec).

I don’t think this warrants a changelog entry.
Two main purposes of changes here:

- To make the formatting and indentation of the raw output prettier;
- To simplify the HTML yielded by dropping unnecessary bits.

The 404 changes are a tad more extensive, altering the actual wording to
match conventional stub 404 pages a little more.
This includes several breaking changes, but they’re easy to adjust for.

Atom 1.0 is superior to RSS 2.0 in a number of ways, both technical and
legal, though information from the last decade is hard to find.
http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/Rss20AndAtom10Compared
has some info which is probably still mostly correct.

How do RSS and Atom compare in terms of implementation support? The
impression I get is that proper Atom support in normal content websites
has been universal for over twelve years, but that support in podcasts
was not quite so good, but getting there, over twelve years ago. I have
no more recent facts or figures; no one talks about this stuff these
days. I remember investigating this stuff back in 2011–2013 and coming
to the same conclusion. At that time, I went with Atom on websites and
RSS in podcasts. Now I’d just go full Atom and hang any podcast tools
that don’t support Atom, because Atom’s semantics truly are much better.

In light of all this, I make the bold recommendation to default to Atom.

Nonetheless, for compatibility for existing users, and for those that
have Opinions, I’ve retained the RSS template, so that you can escape
the breaking change easily.

I personally prefer to give feeds a basename that doesn’t mention “Atom”
or “RSS”, e.g. “feed.xml”. I’ll be doing that myself, as I’ll be using
my own template with more Atom features anyway, like author information,
taxonomies and making the title field HTML.

Some notes about the Atom feed template:

- I went with atom.xml rather than something like feed.atom (the .atom
  file format being registered for this purpose by RFC4287) due to lack
  of confidence that it’ll be served with the right MIME type. .xml is a
  safer default.

- It might be nice to get Zola’s version number into the <generator>
  tag. Not for any particularly good reason, y’know. Just picture it:

    <generator uri="https://www.getzola.org/" version="0.10.0">
	Zola
    </generator>

- I’d like to get taxonomies into the feed, but this requires exposing a
  little more info than is currently exposed. I think it’d require
  `TaxonomyConfig` to preferably have a new member `permalink` added
  (which should be equivalent to something like `config.base_url ~ "/" ~
  taxonomy.slug ~ "/"`), and for the feed to get all the taxonomies
  passed into it (`taxonomies: HashMap<String, TaxonomyTerm>`).
  Then, the template could be like this, inside the entry:

    {% for taxonomy, terms in page.taxonomies %}
        {% for term in terms %}
            <category scheme="{{ taxonomies[taxonomy].permalink }}"
		term="{{ term.slug }}" label="{{ term.name }}" />
	{% endfor %}
    {% endfor %}

Other remarks:

- I have added a date field `extra.updated` to my posts and include that
  in the feed; I’ve observed others with a similar field. I believe this
  should be included as an official field. I’m inclined to add author to
  at least config.toml, too, for feeds.
- We need to have a link from the docs to the source of the built-in
  templates, to help people that wish to alter it.
The variable name matched the RSS tag it ended up in, but was misleading
about what it actually was—because if you actually want “last build
date”, you should use `now()`. (Due to the potential for edits, I think
that either there should be an official `updated` field on pages, or
that these templates should use `now()`.)
Also change a few other things to use it, as noted in CHANGELOG.md.

TODO:

- Write a couple of tests: updated field, last_updated template variable

One slight open questions: should `updated` default to the value of
`date` rather than to None? Then pages with `date` could safely assume
`updated`.
Also a FIXME on the rebuilding part, because it’s presently very wrong.
@chris-morgan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Test failures are not my fault: tests are failing on the next branch.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Keats Keats left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not much to say, very nice!

- Add `updated` front-matter field for pages, which sitemap templates will use for the `SitemapEntry.date` field instead of the `date` front-matter field, and which the default Atom feed template will use
- Add `lang` to the feed template context
- Add `taxonomy` and `term` to the feed template context for taxonomy feeds

## 0.10.2 (unreleased)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you move the 0.10.2 changes to the 0.11 part?

filename if filename == site.config.feed_filename => {
// FIXME: this is insufficient; for multilingual sites, it’s rendering the wrong
// content into the root feed, and it’s not regenerating any of the other feeds (other
// languages or taxonomies with feed enabled).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the whole rebuild subcrate needs to be rewritten :(

<id>{{ feed_url | safe }}</id>
{%- for page in pages %}
<entry
{%- if page.lang != lang %} xml:lang="{{ page.lang }}"{% endif -%}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's wrong with always setting the lang?

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ A taxonomy has five variables:
- `paginate_by`: if this is set to a number, each term page will be paginated by this much.
- `paginate_path`: if set, this path will be used by the paginated page and the page number will be appended after it.
For example the default would be page/1.
- `rss`: if set to `true`, an RSS feed will be generated for each term.
- `feed`: if set to `true`, a feed will be generated for each term.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we add it's an atom feed by default there?

@Keats
Copy link
Collaborator

Keats commented Apr 14, 2020

I've fixed the tests on next if you want to rebase.

@Keats Keats merged commit 0ac70cb into getzola:next Apr 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants