Set to dnf #1689
Set to dnf #1689
Conversation
|
Do you know what version that changed it? It would be nice to note "use yum on XXX and after XXX use dnf". |
|
|
| @@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ General Notes | |||
|
|
|||
| apk add --virtual build-deps file make gcc musl-dev libffi-dev | |||
|
|
|||
| On Fedora Rawhide for Fedora 33, one might need to do this:: | |||
| On Fedora Rawhide or Fedora 33, one might need to do this:: | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| On Fedora Rawhide or Fedora 33, one might need to do this:: | |
| On Fedora Rawhide for Fedora 33, one might need to do this:: |
I believe the "for" was correct there. This is documenting one specific system version, not all versions of Rawhide.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Honestly I find the paragraph a bit confusing: Fedora is moving quickly but the referenced package names should be pretty stable. How about moving the referenced issues right below the Alpine instructions (these are all Alpine issues) and then write something like: "For Fedora (as of Fedora 33), one might need to do this::"?
I am aware that this is only somewhat related to the actual topic of this pull request, but I can submit a separate PR once I know that at least one person other than me would approve it.
dnfis the default CLI tool for dealing with packages nowadays.