-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lfo waveforms are not scaled uniformly #64
Comments
Also, is there documentation for the available waveforms for lfo() and for s.note.seq( sine( btof( 1 ), 7, 0), 1/4) style functions? |
no, there is no documentation, I'll look into that. Hopefully taking everything bipolar will be relatively easy as well. |
Cool - FYI i think it is only the square wave that is not bipolar (is true for the square() function as well).
… On Apr 8, 2021, at 8:08 AM, charlie roberts ***@***.***> wrote:
no, there is no documentation, I'll look into that. Hopefully taking everything bipolar will be relatively easy as well.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#64 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPGSWBCFFCFKAPZFPC6UYTTHWMETANCNFSM42R5QJQQ>.
|
still no documentation, but all the waves (square, triangle, sine, noise) are correctly biased / scaled now. |
ok documentation added. |
I also added documentation for the lfo shorthands |
for the lfo() function, sine and triangle waves are bipolar whereas saw and square waves are unipolar
s = Synth()
s.note.seq([0,1,2,3], 1/4)
s.gain = lfo('sin', btof(1), 0.3, 0.) //twice as fast
s.gain = lfo('sin', btof(1), 0.3, 0.3)
s.gain = lfo('square', btof(1), 0.3, 0.)
s.gain = lfo('saw', btof(1), 0.3, 0.)
s.gain = lfo('triangle', btof(1), 0.3, 0.3) //bipolar as well
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: